Our hospitals have state-of-art equipment that increase success rate of stem cell therapy in India. Tour2India4Health is a medical value provider that offers access to the stem cell therapy for patients from any corner of the world. We offer low cost stem cell therapy at the best hospitals in India. How things function at Tour2India4Health Group:
Con Whether stem cell research should be conducted or not is a massive issue that can be approached from many fact-based perspectives, but the more controversial debate is over whether the stem cells used should be embryonic or adult stem cells.
Some of the main arguments in favor of embryonic stem cell research claim that adult cells are less abundant and more difficult to cultivate in large amounts, and since they are more mature they have a lack of information on early Should stem cell research be legal development.
However, adult stem cell research is just as effective and held to a higher moral standard than embryonic stem cell research and thus is the only form of the exploration that should be in practice. One of the first issues with using embryonic stem cells is that they are undifferentiated while adult stem cells are sourced from body tissues and organs and therefore can lead to more specific and conclusive research 1.
Also, as far as availability is concerned, adult stem cells have been effectively sourced from over 10 different tissues and organs to work towards a treatment for various diseases and conditions 2. The use of differentiated cells is favorable because of how much more specific research can be gauged off of them and the argument against the abundance of adult stem cells is weakened by the fact that they can be widely sourced.
Stem Cells without Embryo Destruction. Understanding Controversy and Society. Report this Argument Pro One of the most controversial topics discussed in modern society is the ethical implications of embryonic stem cell research. Stem cells are unique in their ability to transform themselves into other types of specialized cells from which tissues, bones, and organs are composed.
They have the capability to reduce the need for insulin shots in diabetics, repair damaged joints, treat deafness and cancer, and potentially cure a plethora of other diseases that medical science struggles to Should stem cell research be legal today 1.
While it is true that somatic and artificially produced "reprogrammed" stem cells can also be used to fight disease, they are more expensive and time consuming to produce, as well as difficult to grow and limited in uses in comparison to embryonic stem cells 2.
Report this Argument Con Although not all believe that the use of embryonic stem cells is unethical, it is vital that the beliefs of every one of us is respected.
The benefits of embryonic stem cells can still be achieved under the use of adult stem cells. A Harvard Stem Cell Institute in Boston has demonstrated the capability of turning ordinary skin cells into what appear to be virtually embryonic stem cells 1. Using and transforming these skin cells is better than using embryonic stem cells because they have the capability to produce the same and in some cases better results while avoiding the ethical concerns of embryonic stem cells.
The beliefs one person adheres to should not dictate the behavior of people who hold different beliefs. Lawrence Goldstein, a highly regarded scientist and researcher at the University of California laboratory seeking a better understanding of debilitating disorders, makes the point that public research facilities exist to serve society and no research is more important than that which improves societal health and well-being; in order to make the most progress against disease, researchers must use all of the tools at their disposal, including both somatic and embryonic stem cells 1.
Connecting to this point, Goldstein notes that the medical therapies developed using the research on adult stem cells, even with their limitations in viability and potential, attests to the vastly greater potential of embryonic stem cells, due to their exceptional flexibility 2.
Potential scientific advancements that can benefit all of modern society should not be restricted or ignored in order to avoid offending the beliefs of some of its sub-sects. Report this Argument Con Adult stem cells can be used to help treat those with currently incurable ailments and still respect the beliefs of others.
By acknowledging the beliefs of those against embryonic stem cell research and still moving forward with the research is disrespectful and unfair.
Not all of the people against embryonic stem cell research are unaware of its capabilities, however. Mona Charen is the mother of a year-old son with severe juvenile diabetes, and although she is an advocate for scientific breakthroughs Charen still believes that taking stem cells from human embryos is wrong 1.
Charen also believes that it is more logical to allow human embryos to reach a later stage of development before utilizing them for research because they can then be used to study endoderm-based organs 2.
The pros of allowing embryos to mature far outweighs the cons; valuable research can still be obtained while not only respecting but upholding the beliefs of all. Report this Argument Pro Scientific research continuing in the face of adversity and opposition, regardless of its fairness and respectfulness towards the beliefs of its opponents, is nothing new.
I reiterate, it is irrational for a society to halt scientific progress for all in order to avoid potentially offending the beliefs of one of its sub-sects. Prohibiting the research of potential uses of embryonic stem cells in treating and curing debilitating diseases is unethical, as the use of both somatic and embryonic stem cells is necessary to successfully combat these diseases.
The prohibition of embryonic stem cell research hinders the progress towards possible treatments and cures for diseases that are more difficult or unable to be treated with the knowledge gathered from somatic stem cell research almost solely for the sake of avoiding offending the beliefs of some groups of people, an utterly unethical decision that places more value on the feelings of certain individuals than the physical well-being of others.
Report this Argument Con Although Jehovah"s Witnesses refuse blood transfusions, the medical implications of the process are not replaceable.
The implications of embryonic stem cell research can be mirrored by adult stem cell research, so it is a moral dilemma that can be avoided without harming medical progression.
Despite what the media has portrayed, some studies show that adult stem cells are outright more valuable than embryonic stem cells. Science writer Michael Fumento shares this perspective and has the facts to prove it.
Fumento highlights that adult stem cells are routinely treating or curing over 80 different diseases when embryonic stem cells are not even ready for human clinical trials 1.
He also gives his insight on why the media has advocated for embryonic stem cell research, mainly because they are the same demographic that supports issues such as abortion and euthanasia 2.
Many of the people against embryonic stem cell research are also pro-life, because of the overriding belief that human life begins at conception. On the flipside, those who are in favor of abortion generally share the same view on embryonic stem cell research, manipulating the ideas of the general public.
Report this Argument Pro The notion that adult stem cell research could replicate the potential applications of embryonic stem cell research in its entirety is a misconception that is simply not true.
While adult stem cells have led to some successful treatments and therapies, many scientists continue to assert that research using stem cells derived from alternative sources have not shown the same promise as that of embryonic stem cells; additionally, researchers have maintained that certain stem cell lines are better suited to adapting and becoming particular cell types than others 1.
The limitations posed by the currently scarce number of available cell lines could potentially be rectified by utilizing embryonic stem cells to treat or cure the ailments that adult stem cells have yet to have an effect on.
With regards to the point about clinical trials, it is important to note that the reason embryonic stem cells have yet to reach human clinical trials is due to the restriction on their research.Opponents of human embryonic stem cell research often champion human adult stem cells, umbilical cord blood stem cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells as suitable alternatives to embryonic.
Question: "What should a Christian's view be on stem cell research?" Answer: With the current debate raging about stem cell research, Christians would do well to educate themselves on the topic and its ramifications.
To cure disease and alleviate suffering are noble pursuits, and the Bible clearly supports the battle against physical ills. Last year, Snow told the White House press corps that the president vetoed the stem cell bill because he considered embryonic stem cell research to be “murder,” something the federal government should .
Stem cell laws and policy in the United States have had a complicated legal and political history. Aug 09, · Embryonic stem cell research, which uses special cells found in three- to five-day-old human embryos to seek cures for a host of chronic diseases, has sparked a major moral and political debate in the United States.
The purpose of this RFI is to solicit feedback from industry, academia, research laboratories, government agencies, and other stakeholders to assist in further defining the scope and priorities of EERE’s commercialization and entrepreneurship activities.